Quote from: styca on November 26, 2018, 06:59:07 AM

Quote from: thenextking on November 26, 2018, 05:17:24 AM

these greedy motherfackers don't make any sense, just useless crap after useless crap. no innovation to justify it.
what do you think?

Yes, I agree. Even the first bitcoincash was totally pointless, and it offered nothing that wasn't already provided (but better) by other existing coins. Some forks are genuine and are motivated by fundamental differences, but others are just cash grabs.

Yes, that is the problem, forking means upgrading and not to exploit it to make more money. They seem to look arguing about which one is better but at the end of it all both party have their forked token after all. This seems like a conspiracy wherein they talk about arguing about something that will end up forking the coins where at the end both party benefits from it. If they fork, they must make sure the one that the opposing party holdings is invalid but that is not the case. Look at Bitcoin both of them are arguing which is which but at the end both party holds the two forked coins (BCH and BTC ) at the end forking seems to look like a means to accumulate more wealth.