Quote from: Anduck on November 27, 2018, 04:18:18 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on November 27, 2018, 03:52:57 PM

Quote from: Anduck on November 27, 2018, 02:55:27 PM

DT1 members who have added Vod on DT2 are not acting about it, because 1) it's just one case 2) they're inactive 3) this case is too complex, takes a lot time to objectively comprehend what happened 4) they simply don't care.

Is that something DT1 members told you or did you make that up?

What's your point? To derail this thread even more with irrelevant stuff to make it even more incomprehensible for everyone to see what Vod is doing?

Anyway,
DT1's are inactive regarding trust list changes. You know this, you've been around, so why question this?
I'm sure people like Cyrus have tons of other things to do than go read some boring & complex situation about one single DT abuse/misuse case. This stands for other DT1's as well as to people in general.

There's no point talking with intellectually dishonest and unfair people like you, so I'm not proving you anything, so let's settle your question by me choosing your latter option as an answer. You still haven't commented anything about Vod's wrongdoing. All you do in this thread is trying to bash me. Wonder what's your agenda... I guess it aligns somewhat well with what someone said elsewhere about you: "Suchmoon always sides with people they feel are on the higher position." Think about this, if it's unintentional.

You're making what sounds like a statement of fact but it turns out to be false or at least misleading. Do you really not see a problem with that and with the statements you're making in your thread in general?

You could have said that (a) you didn't get a response from DT1, or (b) you think they're not responding for the reasons you listed above. It was your own choice to word it in a way that makes you look like a liar, which is not the first time in this thread and also appears to be one of the reasons for your red trust. You could have explained afterwards that it's just your speculation and that would be ok but instead you decided to double down on it. Pro tip: if you don't want to derail your thread with irrelevant stuff - don't post irrelevant stuff.

My disagreement with you doesn't mean I'm bashing you personally, while on the other hand you are trying to make it personal. I have nothing to gain by "siding" with Vod. I do trust his judgement far more that yours though.