Quote from: fidotnews on November 28, 2018, 12:05:45 AM

Quote from: gee777 on November 27, 2018, 09:18:32 PM

Quote from: ganeshramk on November 27, 2018, 07:07:34 PM

Quote from: Ace44 on November 27, 2018, 11:57:47 AM

You are right, i think it will be best if they create preferences for users, like those with minimum amount to invest can bring little or no proof of identification, in my opinion, KYC should be for those with huge amount to invest because when it comes to scrutiny from the authorities, huge investments is what they aim at, so i see no much reason why such is needed

These days KYC is getting much easier. Only thing is team needs to be careful about choosing a right partner to do this in an efficient manner.

Most crypto community guys do hate kyc although we have to realise that it is for our good and most times it doesn't take most of our time.

what do you mean - is for our good?
I think that KUS is not needed at all, and it severely limits the development of projects.

In a way it brings some level of security to users of the platform. If you were scammed it would be easier to trace the person that scammed you. As for the project development limitation can you shed more light?