Quote from: Sportsclips on January 30, 2014, 12:46:36 AM

Quote from: opnoskatt on January 30, 2014, 12:45:06 AM

Quote from: Sportsclips on January 30, 2014, 12:37:57 AM

Quote from: opnoskatt on January 30, 2014, 12:26:45 AM

Quote from: Sportsclips on January 30, 2014, 12:25:46 AM

Quote from: 42Dice on January 29, 2014, 10:52:13 PM

I am the owner of 42dice.com and I am looking for one or two people to fund the casino. House edge is 1% and you of course would get a portion of the profits.

The website is 100% ready to go and only needs a bankroll.

I can prove I own 42dice.com. (Change the text on the website, whatever you need to see)

If you are interested please let me know. Any other questions feel free to ask as well.

This is a great investment opportunity if you own a large share of 42.

Thanks.

If it has no funding, then why would I only get a piece of profits? Seems I should get all of the profits, if I am supplying all of the bankroll.

Go and create your own site... what an idiotic comment.

How is that an idiotic comment? Guy makes another dice site (like there isnt enough), but has no funding. Then asks for full funding, for a small piece.....

How is it not idiotic? Someone does the work to setup a site, including the upfront hosting costs that come along. He offers investors the opportunity to make a purely passive income simply by funding. What benefit would there be to giving away everything the site makes and not having a dime to actually run it? That's pretty much the definition of idiotic.

Then fund it.....

Wanna bet you lose all your funds?

That's irrelevant to the conversation. "seems I should get all the profits" is the term I have an issue with. The risks of dealing with a site owner is something the investor can deal with. The idea that all 100% of profits should be returned to an investor in any situation is stupid no matter how you spin it.