Quote from: byteball on December 04, 2018, 06:37:55 PM

Quote from: jerome892 on November 29, 2018, 12:55:28 PM

Aren't these totally different things? I mean, one thing is occupying a part of another country and totally different is that you want to keep all people of colour out of your country?

The parallel I was drawing was that all four neglect/violate post-1945 borders:
1) Blowing up Yugoslavia with pumping/propping up ethnic tensions, recognition of Kosovo;
2) Blowing up USSR into 15 "States" some of them not quite full-blown ones, with only half of them really independent;
2) Refusal to recognise Russian Crimea+Sevastopol despite them being Russian in 1945 (and Sevastopol being Soviet in 1991);
3) Propaganda that all migrants should be freely admitted on US South border.

There could be more examples. The basic idea here is: transnational capital has no borders, so stop shouting about need to defend them.

I may be missing something here, but why stop shouting about defending borders because of transnational capital?

How about caring about the southern US/Mexico border strictly for crime control, in terms of murder, rape, drugs?

I don't think I even know ANYBODY that cares about "transnational capital."