Quote from: Cryptoalt1990 on December 05, 2018, 04:13:13 PM

Quote from: bible_pay on December 05, 2018, 03:49:49 PM

Its not true that Im manipulating polls; Togo pointed out the danger of relying on multiple choice web polls and I agree. As you can see the Sanc poll is showing a lot of interest in pog2! And I am holding off on my vote weight to see how its going before weighing in completely.

Not sure if that was addressed to me but:

1) I never talked about you manipulating polls.
2) I am just stating facts. The poll currently opened on the forum doesn't matter since you went with the masternode proposal route. People are still voting on this poll. Close it since it is of no use now and will avoid confusion.

Quote from: bible_pay on December 05, 2018, 03:49:49 PM

Its not true that Im manipulating polls; Togo pointed out the danger of relying on multiple choice web polls and I agree. As you can see the Sanc poll is showing a lot of interest in pog2! And I am holding off on my vote weight to see how its going before weighing in completely.

1) I think you are not neutral and would like to go with POG tbh. I think a lot of people (if not everyone here) know so.
2) You have an interesting point. By going with the proposal way, that means that all the current PODC miners with their stake locked in PODC (instead of masternodes) cannot expressed their opinion right now.

I never said the live web poll was not valuable, I just gave it a value lower than Sanc polls. It's not expired yet; so it should stay. It will stay because people are still making comments on the thread also. And I would like to see how it ends.

(Not worried about who specifically said I was manipulating - I wanted to express my opinion on how we ended up with a sanc poll).

Your opinion about me being biased towards POG vs PODC is based on your perception that I favor POG because I like it personally, but in reality I would vote for POG based on the easy-adoption potential, not because I like POG more than cancer mining. So let me clear the record for you: I would like to use the algorithm that provides easy adoption - and Im neutral about cancer mining vs POG.

On #2, no - Incorrect - you have no idea how many PODC miners have sancs. However, Sancs should make the financial decisions for this community. Therefore we should have a Prod proposal for POG *after* the testnet era is over. This will give much clearer insight for everone on if it should be promoted to prod. (Even if we use POG to replace POBH for a while - Im saying this would be a proposal to promote POG to replace PODC for a certain mandatory in the future). Thats clearly a sanctuary poll and decision.