Quote from: bible_pay on December 05, 2018, 04:37:21 PM

Quote from: Cryptoalt1990 on December 05, 2018, 04:32:30 PM

Quote from: Cryptoalt1990 on December 05, 2018, 04:13:13 PM

Quote from: bible_pay on December 05, 2018, 03:49:49 PM

As you can see the Sanc poll is showing a lot of interest in pog2! And I am holding off on my vote weight to see how its going before weighing in completely.

1) I think you are not neutral and would like to go with POG tbh. I think a lot of people (if not everyone here) know so.
2) You have an interesting point. By going with the proposal way, that means that all the current PODC miners with their stake locked in PODC (instead of masternodes) cannot express their opinion right now.
3) Which brings me to this point, you want adoption by attracting more miners but do not seem to give a lot of weight about the opinion of your current miners. Seems a bit paradoxical to me.

Since I edited my message before you saw the new point. Please see 3. and how it relates to 2. after reading below.

You are incorrect. It is a fact that current valid stakes for PODC are not currently used for masternode voting else they would not be able to use these funds to stake (since they would be locked in masternodes). They may have both PODC stakes and masternode, but they also may not, no one knows. I believe that the majority does not. Even if some of them did, their voting power would be greatly reduced because they would not be able to use their current PODC stake to vote on the proposal.

No - incorrect ; You have no idea how many Sancs a PODC miner owns.

Please, do not continue to argue on this thread, let's stop here.

This is not what I said...can you read my post? Let me highlight the part you missed.

"Even if some of them did, their voting power would be greatly reduced because they would not be able to use their current PODC stake to vote on the proposal."