Quote from: cAPSLOCK on December 06, 2018, 08:38:03 PM

Quote from: hv_ on December 06, 2018, 06:55:30 PM

Quote from: realr0ach on December 06, 2018, 05:46:44 PM

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on December 06, 2018, 05:30:41 PM

Is that you rOach?

Since most of you don't have sufficient intelligence to branch predict the only possible way certain crypto systems can evolve, here is your trojan horse, permissioned ledger Lightning Network:

Hm - u are correct this time.

LN is nothing new. We know it from old banking / settlement / clearing / netting process.

the only new and proven thing is pure on chain.

Why kicking that ?

-> Some devs want to be better than Satoshi and some miners / exchanges want a lot of different coins.

This is so obvious it hurts me to post it.

NOBODY IS KICKING LAYER ONE. WE ARE GIVING PEOPLE THE FREEDOM TO DO AS THEY PLEASE. THE BANKS ARE COMING WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT. LET'S KEEP THEM AWAY FROM TRASHING UP LAYER ONE.

Ahem... sorry... but I feel I am entitled from time to time.

Also people can keep using layer one. The blocksize on layer one will increase over time.

But this is the conservative approach, and is wiser.

Ok, calling new tech and economical relevant injections like SW + LN + ... (even the 1MB invention was a new thing) conservative is beyond my understanding. So good luck with any future try to increase layer one by demand? Or what measure? And how? ...

To really disrupt the world and show the full potential of Bitcoin and attract any sort of business with a stable unlimited protocol, that approach didn't age well .

We ll see