Quote from: admissions on December 10, 2018, 11:21:13 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 10, 2018, 11:03:31 PM

Some of these have proven they certainly are not good selections for being a mod.

You need people that are open minded and not afraid to revise their first decision if logical and reasonable consideration of observable events require it. Also need to be balanced and fair.

There is only 1 person so far that I have encountered that seemed to be sensible and reasonable.

What criteria was used to place these selections here.

For sure I do not say ALL would be unsuitable but for certain some would.

This selection is horrible really its just members which are popular here on the forums rather than people who report the most. Reporting posts in sections which are in need of moderators should be the highest thing when considering a member as a moderator. Then judging those that report the most against each other and taking in time zones in an account. theymos probably has his own system but amount of reports and time zone surely are the highest priority and of course whether they are trustworthy or not.

I agree and they are not even that popular only with each other. Most are quite unsuitable for any position of power here.

Fairness is the number 1 thing I would look for. Being a moderator is akin to being a judge. You need balance, logic and reason along with being objective and open minded.