Re: Top 200 Merit receivers without Merit from the Top 200 Merit receivers
Sad to hear that I am on ignore but I do understand that you did not enjoy me asking you to substantiate certain claims which were untrue.
That's not why you're on ignore. You're on ignore because you keep asking the same thing over and over again, in several different topics. That's close to trolling, and ignore solves that. Read the last few pages of your post history: it's the same thing over and over again.I don't have to disprove your claims. If you make a claim, it's up to you to back it up with data.
Quote
I mean most members on this forum never visit meta so that would be more of a sensible comparison
You're contradicting yourself: if most people don't visit Meta, it wouldn't matter if Merit earned in Meta was removed. Then again, you can make the same claim about any board: "most users don't visit ".Quote
I will give you some merits once you fulfill a true representation of what I said in the other thread but don't half meet my criteria for my statements and then assume you have made a rebuttal.
That sounds like work, I don't work for Merit, but I do work for Bitcoin 
Quote
Great work so far and I do appreciate the effort.
Thanks 
I still think you're barking the wrong tree though.Quote
For instance a poster posting only in alt discussion that has earned only 20 merits total could actually be as good or better poster than someone earning 400 merits in meta. That's all there is to it.
Good posts in Spam Megathreads aren't worth anything if nobody reads them. Of course the altcoin boards would be much better without all the spam, but Merit isn't enough to end that.