Quote from: Labteck on February 01, 2014, 09:34:41 AM

Quote from: pinarello on February 01, 2014, 09:25:14 AM

Quote from: xyzzyx on February 01, 2014, 09:21:36 AM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 01, 2014, 08:48:09 AM

Quote from: pinarello on February 01, 2014, 08:34:52 AM

Can you politly ask him to write something down? we NEED this desperatly !

Asked ages ago, his position sounds like that (my wording):

Satoshi's whitepaper has never been critically reviewed. This led to the situation when serious problems like Centralization, Selfish Mining, etc. were revealed too late. More problems will arise in the future (Huge Fees, Ecological Catastrophe). By refusing to write the whitepaper BCNext forces us to analyze Nxt concept as deep as possible.

[offtopic]
Had you noticed that when writing Satoshi and BCNext both used double spaces after periods? Just sayin'.
[/offtopic]

A lot of people do that.But yes,It's right.
Spot on!

Anyone did a forensic style of writing comparison between BCNext and Sataoshi. After a few minutes reading through both of their posts I see some obvious similarities in style and voice. Some things you can't place your finger on, just the voice coming though of a very efficient technical and well spoken person. Saw some glaring similarities like statements like 'I agree' and both tend to start posts with I. They both also often list things 1) 2) 3) etc, no unusual but another similarity. Anyone have any other similarities to share?