oh here we go.. mr "dev state" defender numero one with his insults.
yawn

Quote from: DooMAD on December 16, 2018, 11:26:31 PM

If I were in charge, I'd make sure I did all the things that annoy Franky1 before he ever got into Bitcoin, so that he might never get involved to begin with and we might be spared the horrors of his incessant whiny bitching.

Quote from: franky1 on December 16, 2018, 09:16:56 PM

again if you understood consensus as it was in 2009 2013.

You don't want people to understand consensus, you want to distort and pervert the meaning of the word "consensus" to something that suits your bullshit propaganda. You are attempting to brainwash people. Fortunately, most people aren't stupid enough to fall for it. Most people understand that those securing the chain decide what consensus is. The simple and undeniable fact is that 9000+ nodes are running Core software. None of the supposedly bad things you whine about (in every goddamn thread, seemingly) would have happened if people chose to run other clients instead. You can leave at any time if you don't approve of the decisions which the people securing this network are freely choosing to make. Your quarrel lies with them. They're running the code you don't like.

^ the main authoritarian admirer at his best flip flop attempts
look at him tell people that if they dont like things they should leave at any time if they dont approve
typical mindset

in consensus its simple
if people dont approve they should not leave
they should just not approve of something they do not approve of.

leaving is not a vote. leaving is avoiding a vote thus letting the corrupt automatically get 100% simple because the only ones left to vote are the sheep adoration brigade

typical for core fans, want to remove people that dont approve which is what occured in august 2017 (the blockchain doesnt lie)
and thats how the core now hav majority as oppose to only 35% in spring 2017

..
but you lot continue with your mindset of "dev state" adoration. you simply just have to admit that your authoritarian centralists an the debate ends

you fear having diverse teams of different brands cooperating on a single network
you fear having diverse teams of different brands offering proposals that oppose cores roadmap
you fear having diverse teams of different brands that could oppose cores wishes

all you desire is core control where everyone else just follows cores roadmap. thus you do not want a decentralised diverse network of different brands you want a core branded network of sheep that are just distributing core code to retain cores control and leadership