Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on December 17, 2018, 02:38:45 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 17, 2018, 11:54:10 AM

As I said before remove the top 300 (circle and those desperate to enter the circle) and the circlers fav sub board meta board and you will see people lose average of 80% or greater some over 90%.

So remove all the merit sources, and remove one of the least spammy boards, and people will have less merit. I'm not sure why you think this is some big scandal or conspiracy.

Incidentally, if you take r1s2g3's data, sum the "Total Merit" column, sum the "Merits in Meta" column, divide the two and multiply by 100, the result is 26.9%. Even if you remove the 50 profiles who have earned zero merits in meta, the number is still only 33.9%.

So like if a bank made an error and took like 90% of your money away you would simply say you have less? you mean practically took all of your money right??

So to put your statement in more precise terms.

Remove only 0.13% of the boards users merits and one tiny sub board with a tiny fraction of the forums posters (not posts) and that same 0.13% have "less" LOL less like a couple of percent or maybe 10% ......I think you meant to say their merits are crushed to a tiny tiny fraction of what they had previously been allowed to award themselves.

@ suchmoon

actually was locye who prefers to accept merits for the same data set actually
You saw the same data and did not merit either but now have as I said.