Quote from: The Pharmacist on December 18, 2018, 05:29:44 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 03:48:19 PM

TP is one of your ass lickers supporting bullshit like you keeping 3000bch apparently ... I cant take his moral compass seriously being a former scam lover of dash either. Even if is not true ( i have not looked into it) the fact that he thinks it is fine if it did happen even though the investors did not come off well over all of this is an example of his reasoning.

I'm not a Dash lover by any means, though I've stated in the past that it's one of the coins I've liked. I don't own any and have never done anything to seriously hype it, nor have I ever owned more than about 12 Dash at any given time. I've always said I liked it because of the low transaction fees and quick confirmation times and its somewhat bad-boy reputation as being originally intended for use on the dark markets (which I've never had a part of). I've always stated that I'm aware of its shady beginnings, the instamining and all of that.

As far as that situation with the 3000 BCH, I did pose a question in the thread about what happens in situations when a deal is underway and then a fork happens, i.e., who keeps the forked coins. I can also tell you that I don't completely understand what that whole situation was about, much less what Lauda's role in it really was. I often find myself reading claims on bitcointalk and not knowing all of the background or who's telling the truth, since there are so many scammers and liars here.

I'm not trying to use ignorance as an excuse in the case you're referring to--I'm genuinely ignorant of what that deal was about, but I knew enough to question whether there was something arranged between the parties involved beforehand about the forked coins. If you've got an investigation you can bring forth about Lauda, why don't you just do it instead of talking about it. Then I'd like to hear the honest opinions from a variety of senior and/or trusted members.

I don't appreciate being called an ass licker of Lauda. I just happen to be loyal to people who've supported me, but not to the point of endorsing scamming behavior, and if that's what happened in that escrow deal then I don't condone that (but I'll need proof that's dumbed-down enough for me to follow)--but I'll always respect Lauda's scam- and spam-busting activities and general attitude. But don't think for a minute that I'm in anyone's pocket, because I'm not.

I may donate time to laudaM in future but since he is already assumed a scammer by many and untrustworthy by more then I can donate my time in other ways that are perhaps even more beneficial. However if you insist we bring this investigation then keep pushing for it and if you want the truth out so bad and I am being lazy on that then you must do what your conscience dictates yourself without waiting for me, I mean if you want to know if you are supporting a scammer out of some misjudged loyalty then perhaps you really need to get to the bottom of this and get all the high merit legends in on the investigations of his entire actions since being here. I mean supporting anyone if you are unsure they are a scammer is very dangerous ground.

That is for you to decide so speaking up saying if there was nothing in the contract saying he could not keep money that was derived off other investors money (investors afaik that got fucked and lost on the project over all) is fine if there is nothing in the contract to say he can not is not moral to me. If it is to you then I would advice people recognise this before listening to your views on anything else. But then I am some bleeding hearted liberal so that again must be decided by others themselves.

I am not out to get you or anyone else specifically. I am simply wanting a fair and objective review of things and will not hesitate to push the facts and observable events out there for public examination.

What does putting on ignore mean here? I though that means you can not read my posts? put me on it or don't put me on it.

Even better bring me 1 instance of me making a false argument here that has no corroborating events behind it. Just because you do not approve of the things I am looking into does not mean they should not be analysed at all for modifications to ensure more optimal results.

Everyone on these threads opposing me are the same names I am seeing where 50% or greater of their merit vanishes from just 10 pals being deleted and you keep meriting their excuses and nonsense.

I am not sure that you are a willing participant in the circle or just fox pup wants to take you out on a date.

Either way be objective on things or just stay out of it. Else I can only conclude you are part of it.