Quote from: DooMAD on December 19, 2018, 01:55:53 PM

Quote from: franky1 on December 18, 2018, 06:25:36 PM

Quote from: DooMAD on December 18, 2018, 01:15:54 PM

You want to undermine those decisions and make unilateral changes.

show me my undermining code that will make unilateral changes..

You know full well that all of your unilateral changes have nothing to do with code and everything to do with telling people what they supposedly can or can't do. Users ran code you don't like that utilised a softfork, so you say we shouldn't have softforks anymore. A very small number of users ran code you don't like that had an activation date, so you say we can't use activation dates anymore. You keep saying "show me the code", but nothing you're advocating can be achieved with code. You're advocating a social contract. Something vaguely akin to an honour system. It's not viable. You can't prevent people from coding something you don't like. Accept it. What you want is impossible.

//EDIT: and if the community ever did find a way to stop people coding things they didn't like, it would be the client you are running that would be the first victim. Be careful what you wish for and understand how much more you'd be complaining if we actually had the kind of Bitcoin you mistakenly believe you want.

mr meander AKA doomad pokes again
1. i am not demanding anything. i am discussing. its a discussion board. dont like my opinion, there is a ignore button, its free
2. this topic is about discussing if we were to change things what would be changed. yes i get how you hate the idea that the community could discuss or even change the network to oppose "dev state" roadmap. but remember this is a discussion of opinions. so relax chill out, have a coffee
3. i am not advocating anything. i am saying bitcoin was designed 2009 to solve the issue of avoiding the need of a "dev state"(general(singular)) and instead where the bitcoin system works via community consensus of generals(plural). because thats the unique thing satoshi solved.
4. i know you want "dev state" to decide changes and have the community as just loyal soldiers just archiving data under the rules defined by dev state. you have been very clear on that. even to such an extent that before even writing public available code you have made it your mission to REKT anyone that opposes "dev state"

all you have done over the last few months is admit your a capitalist centralist where "dev state" are the kings and above the law and they deserve to be free. and everyone else should just be loyalists with no say. because you dont want community votes.. you just keep flip flopping to try hiding your desire. and you pretend you want freedom as long as it only applies to freely letting "dev state" to rule