Quote from: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 07:48:56 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:48:59 AM

suchmoons assumptions and logical fails that he makes time and time again.

My what now?

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:48:59 AM

Stop worrying so much about it all and creating more and more threads about it even though I have said I consider the case closed several times. Then telling me I am continuing to proliferate threads about this topic. Typical example of suchmoon madness.

You've been spamming quite a few merit threads with your tenuous claims so this thread is an attempt to keep it all in one place. I'm sure you'll appreciate that and refrain from off-topic posts elsewhere.

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:48:59 AM

I have demonstrated with suchmoons assistance they are meaningless now

Sorry, what exactly did I assist you with?

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:48:59 AM

so let's discuss some other interesting topics

That's what this thread is for so it's really up to you.

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 01:07:49 PM

Even suchmoon has now confirmed without definition of a good post or good poster then the score is meaningless.

Really? Where did I do that?

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 01:07:49 PM

There is no incorrect way to look at the 0.13% lose 80% or greater of their merits if you simply remove the opinions of the same 0.13% the fact or not they are merit sources with most to give then that is an result of the system and how it is set up and not an excuse to claim that still representing better posts get more merit than less good posts. However, as I have said there is no issue so long as you do not make silly claims about what the numbers mean.

That is simply numbers... that are not bending fact, not looking at the numbers upside down.

No, it's your personal opinion. The numbers don't say why those merits are sent that way. You're simply setting up a straw man argument (e.g. 150k users are eligible for merit) and then topping it up with a false dilemma (e.g. if someone is saying that 0.13% deserve those merits then they're saying that 99.87% can't make better posts). That's not how it actually works. Most users are shitposters, and yes most Legendaries are too - I know you're gonna like this one - so most of those 150k will never receive a single merit, which is how the merit system is supposed to work.

25k users have received merit. Some received more than others, which is inevitable. But simply taking out merit sources or certain boards isn't gonna prove unfairness even if it exists. You can still believe it if you want. It's just that the numbers you keep throwing around don't mean that.

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 01:07:49 PM

~ personal attack

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 03:26:00 PM

~ personal attack

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 03:48:19 PM

So a thorough investigation of your prior history could be put under scrutiny to ensure I have not got you all wrong

Let me guess. You're gonna enroll someone else to do the investigation?

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 03:48:19 PM

~ personal attack

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 04:12:56 PM

~ personal attack

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 05:14:42 PM

~ personal attack

Quote from: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 05:46:45 PM

~ personal attack

I'm getting a feeling that you have personal problems with some (or many) of the top 200 merit receivers, or with people who disagree with you in general, and you're trying to find a way make them look inferior in some way. Which is fair game I guess. As long as you can keep it in this thread and not all over the place (hint: nobody is stalking you even if they happen to post in the same threads as you do).

LOL please re read out prior conversations and find all of those answers for yourself.

If you are unable to then get assistance from anyone else who can read and recall what they have read after 5 mins.

If they are not free to assist you then if you state that I will not find any grounding for those statements one by one and list them as above I will come and assist you.

I don't really have any personal issues with ANY person on this board except scammers/scam enablers/scam protectors.

I will post where I like and when I like so long as I please to do so. You are a spammer and have continuously wanted the last (incorrect) word on everything forcing the conversation to continue as you are doing now.

Loyce and you have now made 2 threads to continue this discussion on this specific topic after I had already said I am ready to move on and happy with the presentation that has been made.

I will not be contained to this thread just because you say so.