Quote from: The Pharmacist on December 19, 2018, 05:29:26 AM

I'd just like to let it be known that at no time has anything been inserted into any of my orifices by any member of bitcointalk. Specifically, I have never been penetrated by Lauda as I believe I read somewhere in this thread. Never even had any decent offers, and I'm a pretty high-class hoe in great demand, too.

I didn't figure cryptohunter would get negged for all of his blabbering as of late, but I probably should have expected it. Same thing happened to mixan a while back when he went off the deep end and started taking the forum hostage with his raving lunacy. There comes a point where if you spout enough nonsense and attack too many people, it's not going to be taken kindly to anymore. I'm a bit puzzled as to why cryptohunter suddenly appeared on the Meta/Reputation scene and started making such a fuss about all of these things. His account is much older than mine, and even I've been here long enough to know how abrasive the culture is around here--and even aside from that, he ought to know this isn't a battle he's likely to win. I haven't even read many posts indicating that there are any members in his corner on all of this stuff about merits and trust abuse and so forth.

I think marlboroza's feedback is somewhat harsh given his DT status, but I know where he's coming from. Lauda has a genuine beef with cryptohunter, so I can understand that. Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true. It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight.

In any case, red trust is not a means to silence anyone--giving someone a ban is. And since cryptohunter states that he doesn't trade here, what's the problem?

Prove any of your points... that anything I have said you can prove is incorrect. Go for it now.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063753.msg47613204#msg47613204
Examine this entire thread it is another case of provably incorrect assumption from DT and not backing down under scrutiny again.

However luckily there are some DT people who are open to being objective.

I though I would see what all this DT was about and what is going on with this board and a bunch of hitlers talking down to everyone and acting all superior whilst having very dubious moral compasses. I will not be getting DT neg trust for anything I have said that you can not demonstrate is wrong or untrue.

Prove anything I have written is not true NOW. Bring your evidence or you are too compounding the abuse with lies. Substantiate you claims or be next in line for trust abuse.

I am waiting. If you do not produce evidence of these allegations of

" Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true. It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight. "

Not that is even apparently the reason so this is again false apparently I am red for saying he misquoted me as he clearly did.

So stop conflating issues and interfering with what you can not understand.

If you can understand then produce now. With evidence. Or retract.