Financial Times wouldn't refer to themselves like that. It's likely from another article quoting FT.
I was thinking the OP inserted that FT reference this one time, but didn't do it in the other posts.
I take it this ban isn't for plagiarism, though, correct? If the ban PM that OP got really said "insufficient comments content" then that means mods are temp-banning shitposters, and I'm all for that. Am I correct about this?
That was the first ban. The OP then got banned again, this time permanently.