Can I ask why you need to be part of the decision process without

1. giving your reasoning behind which ever choices you voted for
2. demonstrate why someone like you who merits a report from an obvious sock puppet 1 day old with no posts to remove a legend that has posted nothing wrong should not be banned yourself at once. answer right now

I mean you are a div just look at some of the statments you have made on the merit thread when trying to respond to me

I would say such a person needs to demonstrate your opinion is even valid and not a pollution and distraction from reaching an optimal solution for getting rid of financially motivated spammers (like you with your high paid sig) and keeping net positive members here who make the odd mistake but overall pay into the system a lot more in terms of real value than idiots like you that just want to spam your sig and sound important.

I mean someone like you with no accomplishments here ever in the big scale of things trying on some twisted cowardly sock puppet report to remove a net positive legend that has had an illustrious posting history makes you actually WAY MORE NET NEGATIVE than a some new spammers who get less that your and tie up less board resources than your sig spamming dumb ass.

Get it now you are part of that gang that tried to silence me and I still see you begging on even though bones just told you you will need a lot more so keep looking you brainless cretin. Pull some more stats the same as I produced from some merits from your pals whilst demonstrating your merits are reduced to dust if you keep to the criteria i asked for in the first place which you refused to produce but still quote me in your op.

fucking net negative skid stain ALSO SUCH MOON JUST SAID YOU WILL REMOVE YOUR SIG FOR 2 YEARS COME AND PROVE HIM CORRECT. HE AGREED TO MY DEAL SO I ASSUME HE ALREADY CONSULTED YOU.