Quote from: supervitek on December 24, 2018, 12:08:02 PM

Quote from: 1ncehost on December 24, 2018, 08:20:02 AM

I have GTX 1060s running at half power and stock clocks. H was the fastest build on them. "I" ran about 5% slower and i++ ran slower still. The time sample size for i and i++ could be small enough to not be meaningful (I didn't run I for long), but the sample size between H and I++ was meaningful. H was considerably faster than I++.

That is interesting, one of my card in a RIG is 1060 3 Gb and "I++" is faster than "H" (I tried H cause I have non stop closing of the program with no error message in about 20 mins - 1 hour).

Quote from: 1ncehost on December 24, 2018, 08:20:02 AM

I have GTX 1060s running at half power and stock clocks. H was the fastest build on them. "I" ran about 5% slower and i++ ran slower still. The time sample size for i and i++ could be small enough to not be meaningful (I didn't run I for long), but the sample size between H and I++ was meaningful. H was considerably faster than I++.

Hi 1ncehost, supervitek,
Thanks for reporting this. That is interesting. We tested on a 1060 3Gb, v1.0i++ (https://miniz.ch/features/) is significantly faster than v1.0h (https://miniz.ch/2018/11/30/my-sol-s/).
There is some variability since these values depend on brand, temperature, stock/OC settings...
We are working on a new version that should be faster than both v1.0h and v1.0h

Cheers