Quote from: TheCrimsonFucker on December 25, 2018, 05:47:40 PM

Almost no project fulfills what it describes in the roadmap, the ICOs are without credibility, unfortunately they chose the worst way of financing.

That is exactly right. In 2018 over 90% of the projects couldn't achieve their goals. Much amateurism. From project teams but also from investors misjudging the projects and basing their decisions on feelings rather than rationality. That is what we have been fighting since the early beginning with out team and CEO Marc Couzic. He was talking about the risk of having many ICOs fail if they did not have use cases already a year ago. But we should also stay positive and mention that many tokens have kept their value while creating a working use case business model according to their road map.

Amazon, Ebay and Google were not built in a day... It is still early stages, but maturity of the market is around the corner. Due diligence and benchmarking best practices is currently the most important. It is not the aim to talk about the overall ecosystem here, but our CEO have wrote a series of very interesting articles on Hackernoon about that. This is also why he has decided to build a model where people will be allowed to buy ERC721 tokens backed by land already during the ICO and why we have decided to call it an FCO (FieldCoin Offering). ICO's were all built on the replication of Ethereum whereas, the possibilities are unlimited. The links are just below for those who want to dive deeper into the subject.

https://hackernoon.com/tokens-with-no-applications-will-die-soon-5b94f8a32748

https://hackernoon.com/make-utility-tokens-great-again-f236b64ee31b

https://medium.com/@marc.couzic/blockchain-is-a-mean-not-an-end-27a92a2e60e4

https://medium.com/@marc.couzic/the-first-fco-field-coin-offering-d34f14e33e71