Quote from: msTrix on December 26, 2018, 01:28:53 PM

Quote from: VasilyS on December 26, 2018, 10:48:30 AM

Quote from: VasilyS on December 24, 2018, 11:51:13 AM

I'm really surprised by the performance of your miner! It gives hashrate 440 h/s while XMRStack on the same overclocking gives only 370 h/s! Thanks a lot!

After some time I switched again to XMRStack because of its better stability. Your miner needs more sophisticated adjustments. It is suitable to have stable configurations for popular GPUs inside your software.

atm stak is definitly not the best / easiest one to configure, and with less tweaking u ll get alot more hash and hash/watt from TRM. TRM needs a bit other clockings than common, but 20% more hash (atleast reading above on same clockings) is worth it Lips sealed

The 15% power consumption reduction alone is worth it to switch over from XMR-Stak. Thats why i did it.

Quote from: VasilyS on December 26, 2018, 10:48:30 AM

Quote from: VasilyS on December 24, 2018, 11:51:13 AM

I'm really surprised by the performance of your miner! It gives hashrate 440 h/s while XMRStack on the same overclocking gives only 370 h/s! Thanks a lot!

After some time I switched again to XMRStack because of its better stability. Your miner needs more sophisticated adjustments. It is suitable to have stable configurations for popular GPUs inside your software.

Stability with TRM is actually A LOT better than XMR-Stak. With XMR-Stak, my rig would BSOD once from 1 day to 5 days. Not to mention the massive amounts of rejected shares.
With TRM, i can run it without issues for a whole week. And i have like 5 rejected shares for 3 days, compared to 30 shares for the same period on XMR-Stak.

Also, TRM DO have auto configuration, but its not the best. And the amount of testing is like... 3-4 combinations total for GPU type.