Quote from: kumiskura on December 26, 2018, 05:28:04 PM

Quote from: glerant on December 26, 2018, 03:36:41 PM

Quote from: kumiskura on December 26, 2018, 03:31:23 PM

I do not agree that because something else is faster than this one. Look at this ;

Quote

with the blockchain supporting hundreds of transactions per second at peak times

you can get that statement on their social media or you can go to here for more about it; https://blog.wavesplatform.com/waves-sets-record-for-maximum-transactions-per-day-c540c9ea92e9

based on that, until today. At best it is only around a hundred~hundreds of transactions per second. While XLM can do 1000 transaction per second based on their claim.
that means XLM is the fastest public blockchain in the world until today.

about XLM, you can read it here; https://www.lumenauts.com/blog/how-many-transactions-per-second-can-stellar-process

You're wrong.

XLM isn't decentralised so you are comparing chalk with cheese. The masternode's can't be considered 'public' either.

In any case you are wrong on speed as well.

Waves can sustain 10K TPS with bulk transfers. So Waves clearly is the fastest.

You are wrong and Yahoo Finance is right.

Alright, it's my fault for not seeing 'public platform' on the thread.
and mind to tell me, where did you see that waves can sustain 10k TPS? obviously, it'll be the fastest blockchain in our world if it is true, but until now.
I have yet to figure this out on the internet? not even on their social media mention it.

The 10K TPS figure is for mass transfers - 100TPS X 100 (MAX) mass transfer = 10K TPS.
The mass transfer really is very useful for airdrops and other transfer types where lots of payments need to be made.

Oh. And I appreciate your civility - not so common on BitCoinTalk Alt forums!