Quote from: king_of_alts on December 29, 2018, 10:32:04 AM

Quote from: matjas on December 29, 2018, 08:53:19 AM

Quote from: traveler007 on December 29, 2018, 07:33:11 AM

Quote from: belechau on December 28, 2018, 10:13:32 PM

The SEC's intervention in the crypt bothers me a lot, but this can be a step further this time, unless it's something very strict and narrow, which throws too much of the concept we're looking for. I hope we have news stories related to STO soon, and consequently the whole crypto

SEC must give answer about ETFs untill end of February (this is last deadline). May be after this they provide some rules for STO projects. I think they are ready for this, but not all prject want to follow rules, because 90% of ICOs in 2017-2018 - were scam. So this securoty tokens really will give us some defense.

It looks like we are very dependent on SEC which is a paradox since crypto wants to be anonymous and decentralized but on the other hand, you need some rules to prevent scams from taking over ICOs like it happened last year.

yes, this is a funny and sad situation. Half the community wants more regulation, the other half wants less. I think if there is no regulation naive and gullible people will fall for scams and this will prevent crypto from attracting more users.

IN my opinion depends on what we're talking about, if we speak about ICOs and STOs, they need regulations, if we speak about sound money (Bitcoin), fuck regulations I want to spend ant currency freely as long as someone accept it as a payment method (or if I want to transfer money anywhere I want)