Quote from: S_Therapist on January 03, 2019, 04:34:07 AM

Lol, can't remember from where I have download it but I'm sure that it was from a guy who told like what you have said.

Double LOL. That was a pic someone sent me in a PM trying to prove they were a bounty hunting community:

Quote from: djuragan on August 24, 2018, 08:20:04 AM

Hello sir,
I'm representing my friends to appeal about our accounts that you give negative trust due to this post.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4650049.0
I wish to inform you that those accounts not belong to a single person, we are making a community to perform bounty campaign.
Does working on bounty campaign with our own individual account against the rules?
About the those wallet that are connected to each other, we used it to safe the fee of transaction.
Some of our team today (the other member are working at home, at the moment):
<snipped out image>
here is our website : http://kidoelkempoel.com/index.html
Please kindly reconsider, and please remove the negative trust on our account.
Thank you.

And then I posted that pic in the Known Alts thread for everyone's pleasure.

So seriously, if you link a whole bunch of accounts via the ETH blockchain (or any one for that matter), they could easily just claim they're just peasants living in a cockroach, crack-smoking shitpost farm and it may well be the truth. Then they'll tell you that they pool the funds to save on transaction fees or some related reason, but I have a theory that there's some big granddaddy of a pimp who takes a cut for letting them work in the crack house spam farm, and they either get a cot to sleep in or access to a computer and high-speed internet that they wouldn't otherwise have.

But whether it's a dirty bunch of snot monkeys doing this or it's a bunch of alt accounts belonging to one person, I think they should be tagged--because if they give the "we're a community" argument, that could easily be a lie and isn't something that should be taken at face value, just like the "I never did plagarism sir" thing we see time and time again shouldn't be believed. It's far more likely that a bunch of addresses all linked together=abusing bounties with alt accounts. And that's how it should read on the negative feedback they get.

Edit:

Quote from: philipma1957 on January 03, 2019, 05:40:47 AM

Could you alter this line. It is pretty racist in context with the photo shown.

Monkey is a slur for a black person, which those folks aren't, they're Inonesian or possibly Filipino, for which there are other racial slurs and what I wrote was not intended to be racist. If you don't like my words, hit that good 'ol ignore button. I'm not going to censor myself at the suggestion of anyone who isn't the boss of me. No offense.