Quote from: abctc on February 03, 2014, 11:14:27 AM

Quote from: jl777 on February 03, 2014, 10:20:51 AM

three different accounts, one for each treasurer.

Marketing = 3 million
infrastructure = 1 million or cost to deploy hubs needed for 1000TPS
tech = ~6 million - infrastructure

deploying the hubs - is a way to centralization. I think it is unacceptable. We need tech solution (in the core of Nxt), that makes profitable for hub owners to install these hubs.
So we do not need infrastructure committee at all.

Please make a specific proposal on how exactly we can get hub owners profitable by April. That is when we want to be able to handle 1000TPS. This is mission critical NXT component and I do not want to leave it to chance, plus there is no defined way for hub owners to make money yet. In any case, the important point is the proposed process. The actual allocation to infrastructure has not been determined yet. Currently we have many nodes that are subsidized and until we have a infrastructure that is self sufficient, I think it makes sense to subsidize it with the available NXT.

After all without the hubs, we won't get 1000TPS and without that we won't have the giant advantage over the other second gens