Quote from: m0gliE on January 07, 2019, 02:16:50 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 07, 2019, 01:59:37 PM

You are a fucking moron, this has already been repeatedly addressed in this thread, and this is not how science works.

Oh sorryyyyyyyy I didn't know science didn't work as a cooperative peer to peer consensus. Oh silly me who forgot that science is only 100% hard proofs or nothing!

I can be dumb sometimes right?

I mean we obviously only have a binary system in science: proved and not proved.

That's how things work Cheesy

EDIT: I might be a fucking moron but at least I'm not in the same bag as Flat Earthers or Evolution denyers. Funny you're the one claiming to be a "logical and scientific" fellas. I guess the 94% of scientists of the planet are as dumb as me?

Before you have consensus you need to produce empirical data, none of which you are able to present. You don't get to skip the most critical step of the scientific method then still claim you are representing science.

"94% of the scientists on the planet" I reiterate - you are a moron.

Quote from: m0gliE on January 07, 2019, 02:24:35 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 22, 2018, 10:45:18 AM

Now if you would please present the empirical data showing that global warming is a result of anthropogenic climate change, as a direct result of human C02 output. Not theories. Not opinions. Not simulations. Not projections. Empirical data.

Oh my god I forgot that xD

TECSHARE you're really a funny guy!

Well the bad side is that you actually have the right to vote... That's one of the problems of democracy, even people without the slightest insight of how science or logic work can vote.

Still it's funny! So i guess you gonna come back all grumpy asking for some "SOLID EMPIRICAL DATA" right?

Yeah, everyone knows empirical data is meaningless in science.