Quote from: rickyjames on February 03, 2014, 01:14:03 PM

Quote from: landomata on February 03, 2014, 01:05:46 PM

Quote from: rickyjames on February 03, 2014, 01:03:32 PM

First, it's "their", not "there". Very important to get that right in the marketing materials.

Second, ladies and gentlemen, you can see right here and right now how the revolution to take the common heritage of the NXT community from the hands of the many into the hands of the few is complete.

that's why i'm not a copy writer....I just think up the strategy and they execute what I say.

That's how Hitler operated, and it certainly is a straightforward management style. I strongly urge you to get some sort of comment-based review cycle and feedback loop into your thinking.

Folks, these committee members haven't actually been selected yet, perhaps you would like to go over there and express your thoughts on who should control this unspent 9M NXT - while you still CAN express your thoughts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=445209.0;all

I think it will be prudent for the community to provide an up or down vote for each slate of proposed committee members.

Voting to be done in a special voting thread with posts. This also allows selection between competing slates. I think it best if the voting was open to eliminate sock puppets affecting the future of NXT.

By voting for an entire slate, we can be sure each slate has the right mix of talents, etc. in them.

We also need to make sure that people on committees cant directly decide to award themselves NXT. Abstention rules, conflict of interest avoidance. Common sense stuff