Quote from: OgNasty on January 08, 2019, 08:32:49 PM

Quote from: Anduck on January 08, 2019, 08:26:42 PM

I have given out perfectly reasonable feedbacks.

Quote from: Anduck's Sent Trust to SaltySpitoon

SaltySpitoon 2018-12-24 If you do business with SaltySpitoon, be careful. Expect problems especially if anything disputable or surprising happens. This person uses twisted logical argumentation when it suits him. Believes prejudice in the face of facts. Finds reasoning to justify whatever activity, regardless of resulting low level of reasonableness, coherence, fairness or even correctness. Applies double standards. Portrays himself as fair and conscientious -- don't fall for that. I've not done business with SaltySpitoon.

I think the situation with Salty could have been handled more reasonably.

Possibly.

Quote from: OgNasty on January 08, 2019, 08:32:49 PM

Quote from: Anduck on January 08, 2019, 08:26:42 PM

Not in Bitcointalk auction standard, obviously.

Then why are you trying to upend the entire trust network to suit what you believe DT should be as a result of you not adhering to the Bitcointalk auction standard as you understand it?

These two things are unrelated. The feedbacks I've received merely increased my motivation to get BCT trust system improved. DT people have way too much power. Also FWIW, I've been against DT-including trust system since it was implemented, just not very vocal about it. (See #bitcoin-otc logs.)

About that auction issue,
I learned about Bitcointalk auction standard regarding vendor bids in that auction. Back then, ~3 years ago, I did not know that vendor bids are not cool here. The bitcointalk auction standard is vague and not even described anywhere. I've held countless auctions since, with no complaints. Now two DT'ers are stepping in to rate me for that vendor bid (at least publicly they state that as the reason). Do you see that as reasonable and justified? "Warning! Trade with extreme caution!"