Quote from: suchmoon on January 10, 2019, 04:32:36 AM

Quote from: OgNasty on January 10, 2019, 04:24:54 AM

LOL. That user was threatening me for quite some time. I didnt make most of it public. Theres no way Id ever remove that rating. Hes lucky I didnt call the police. He 100% deserved the rating he received and probably a lot more. Ive gotten so many death threats from users here over the years, I dont even try to make them public as it would add to my workload. This is actually a good example of why TMAN shouldnt be in DT. He left that lunatic positive trust after he saw me being attacked by him. This is not what we want to see here at bitcointalk. So apparently attacking me is reason enough to earn default trust from TMAN now... Definitely some adjustments need to be made.

There you go. A reason #6 in addition to 5 specious reasons you put in the trust feedback. Exactly my point. You're just making it up as you go.

Just like your ratings for Frij and owlcatz evolved from mere disagreements or misunderstandings to full blown scam accusations.

HabBear was another one that you neg-trusted basically for a post you disliked. That has been removed, so well done. Feel free to rethink your other thin-skinned ratings and exclusions now that you have some free time off DT.

Again, youre mad at me because these people have done so much shady activity? Im only allowed to pick one? The fact there are 6 reasons for someone to get excluded from my trust network or given negative feedback is not a good thing... HabBear asked me to reconsider his trust rating and admitted he made a mistake so I removed his rating. I did the same thing for minerjones after he was caught letting TMAN manipulate an auction and doxxed canaryinthemine. When people act reasonably, I respond reasonably. You might say Im a reasonable person.