Quote from: bitcoin2cash on August 30, 2011, 07:45:57 PM

Quote from: Hawker on August 30, 2011, 07:40:14 PM

Quote from: bitcoin2cash on August 30, 2011, 07:36:45 PM

Quote from: Hawker on August 30, 2011, 05:36:36 PM

You keep on about slavery as if the prohibition to make a fizzy drink and sell it under the name Coca-Cola was the same as being bound in chains to a galley oar for life. Its not the same.

Actually, even without intellectual property laws, that would still be illegal. If you sell me Y and claim it's X, that's fraud. I'm the victim though, not Coca-Cola.

So you respect the right to buy and sell branded goods. Thats trademarks.

It's a word and the rules apply to it like any others. If you sell me "gasoline" but it's really water, that's fraud. If you sell me "Coca-Cola" but it's really Pepsi, that's fraud. It's a word which has a commonly understood meaning.

Its a trademark. If there were no trademark, there would be no Coca-Cola brand as they would be no way to stop other people riding on the back on the Coca-Cola advertising.