Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 10, 2019, 11:17:00 PM

Quote from: teku on January 10, 2019, 07:09:39 AM

No, it's you missed the previous post

Quote from: teku on January 09, 2019, 12:07:26 PM

In this case, specify the title and position of Eric Duprat. It's like " General field Marshal of the Prussian lands, subservient to the Austro-Hungarian government". This is title and achievements of a famous person and mention this to plagiarism is irrelevant.

Stop acting dense. Eric Duprat's title is not "General Manager of Mobile at PayPal where he played an instrumental role in establishing PayPal as a player in mobile payments."
Saying something like "Eric Duprat, General Manager of Mobile at PayPal" is fine as it is clearly a title, but the latter part is clear plagiarism.
You don't come up with this marketing BS yourself, you have to copy it from somewhere. The chance of creating such a specific sentence yourself is very low.

You have a very subjective opinion.
Some things we remember exactly after reading and in their subsequent presentation, we can reproduce them with 100% accuracy. This expression is not too long to copy and it is enough to read once to remember for a long time.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 10, 2019, 11:17:00 PM

That wouldn't be plagiarism because it's very short and not specific. But, if you write something like:

Quote from: https://www.cryptostache.com/2017/08/28/creator-bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto/

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? For those new to the cryptocurrency world, Satoshi Nakamoto is the creator of Bitcoin.

It would be plagiarism because you are directly copying posts from another source, without citing it.
For the exchange registration requirement post, you would put it in a quote or link to the source.

You gave an example of 2 sentences. And if someone writes "Satoshi Nakomoto is a famous person because he created bitcoin". Is this plagiarism? As more and more material is written about cryptocurrency, the risk of creating similar offers increases more and more.