Re: shdvb has the best "Attitude" when it comes to sending trust (BPIP)

Quote from: Lauda on January 11, 2019, 09:31:00 PM

The Pharmacist has sent more ratings then me Huh

Okay, time for kitty to wake up from winter sleep. Game on!

Did you just tag like 600+ accounts, just to be #1 again? Cheesy

You must have missed DT Cheesy

I had this crazy idea to tag 160,000 banned users, but theymos thought I shouldn't:

Quote from: LoyceV on January 06, 2019, 11:27:11 AM

Quote from: theymos on January 05, 2019, 01:35:08 PM

Quote

does it cause problems to the forum if a user leaves feedback to 160,000 users?

It wouldn't significantly bloat the database or anything, but the userpage would definitely time out. Probably you shouldn't.

So this idea is off, Piggy's bot won't tag them.

At some point, Lauda's trust page will time out too.

Quote from: suchmoon on January 11, 2019, 09:34:07 PM

What's going on here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2380455

Looks like a case for admin intervention.

That was handled very fast! I've seen topics about trust-spam go unhandled for months. This is good

Quote from: Vod on January 11, 2019, 11:39:52 PM

Quote from: Atomicat on January 11, 2019, 10:37:07 PM

Isn't it possible to achieve that with a single parser using the recent posts feed?

Well yes, that is the most efficient way to get the newest posts.

I should only have to parse that page once every few seconds. It only shows the last ten posts, and they can come in pretty quick.

I'm downloading it every few seconds, but it can be improved by adjusting for the average number of posts in the past minutes. And if you miss a post due to a quick burst of posts, you could download page 2 or further to catch up.

It would also be very nice to have a real time backup of every merited post, BPIP would be the ideal place to find back the ones that got deleted.