Quote from: LoyceMobile on January 13, 2019, 03:48:00 PM

Quote from: Coolcryptovator on January 13, 2019, 03:42:10 PM

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 13, 2019, 03:26:21 PM

I bought that account.

It's enough. I don't see any point of further discussion. Account buyer can't be trusted as well.

That depends on when it happened, there's a bought account on DT2 now.

Probably more then 1 bought account gonna be on DT over the next few months. With the new system in place almost everyone has a shot at being on DT that can meet the minimum requirements.

This is why I think maybe we should all think about tagging the same users as long as their offense has been proven. This was 1st mentions by EcuaMobi as you'll see in the quote posted below.

Quote from: EcuaMobi on January 11, 2019, 11:22:12 PM

I've just seen this and I'm liking both the idea and the effects to the DT1 list.

Just one thought: since DT1 can change every month so can the DT2 list, so now it makes more sense for several DT1/DT2 members to tag scammers, just in case any tagger stops being DT2 for a few months (I know the idea is for everyone to customize their trust list, but most newbies will still rely on default trust).

And I want to insist on my suggestion regarding trust: guest should see some trust. Default trust would make sense but any trust. Non registered users are still being scammed by known scammers because they don't see the tags.

Side note for S_Therapist, I have stated in the bustadice campaign thread that with all the new changes to DT, I will give users til I grade the campaign this week to get their negative rep sorted out or they lose their spot and pay for the week. You need to work on proving your case if you can