Quote from: bitserve on January 13, 2019, 08:42:26 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 13, 2019, 08:15:27 PM

Quote from: jbreher on January 13, 2019, 02:28:24 AM

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 12, 2019, 08:20:01 PM

Jbear

In your opinion, what are the odds that CSW is Satoshi?

I would be interested in you stating in clear terms what probability you consider this to be true? I appreciate that certain things may be unknowable with present knowledge, but that is why we assign probabilities.

So please tell us what is your probability that CSW is Satoshi.

I dunno. Maybe one in twenty? In fifty?

Hard to place odds on something in which most of the variables are not available to be seen.

It is nice to see that you are placing low odds on CSW being satoshi, and even conceding that a decent amount of information remains unknown.

On the other hand, I find it a bit ironic that you were cluttering this thread with ideas that the negative had not been adequately proven or that there is really any kind of need to spend WO brain power on such question regarding that fucktwat who is most-likely a fraudster.

IIRC, jbreher also stated in the past that he didn't think CSW was satoshi or that it was doubtful and unlikely. It is also true that he has been more clear this time making a specific guess that more closely express his opinion about the unlikeliness chance.

Honestly it doesn't matter in anyone's opinion, fuck Gavin implied that he thought he was at one point, and Gavin had worked with the real Satoshi. It's obvious now that Craig is a lying manipulator.