All I've been asking for is that the principles of logic, reason, and mathematics are adhered to. Which is fully consistent with 'the negative has not been proven'.
You really don't though. You force feed your opinion down peoples' throats by insinuating that if they don't agree with them they must be intellectually inferior. And incredibly, you're wrong far more often than right. Do you use the same principles when making your spectacularly wrong predictions about BCH and SV price movement?
If someone is going to explicitly bludgeon me with some specious claim about my impressions of CSW -- no matter how tenuous -- I am going to insert some rationality into the discourse.
Its not rational to believe there's even a 1% chance that CSW is Satoshi. There's definitive ways in which he could have proven so and when pressured and he failed. He's a sideshow con man and history will remember him as such, if at all.