Quote from: Lauda on January 14, 2019, 07:08:43 PM

Quote from: bill gator on January 14, 2019, 07:05:55 PM

Quote from: TMAN on January 14, 2019, 06:57:21 PM

Allowing Excluded DT-1 Members votes to still be active is a hole in the system.

I disagree. I think this gives the kind of decentralization and depth to the trust system that we're trying to achieve. This avoids making it so a handful of DT1 users are able to control the entire DT.
Those users that are excluded from DT1, but meet all of the other criteria of the new system are certainly members that should have their votes be valid, in my opinion.

Which promotes gang-like retaliatory exclusions [1] (the first case is TheFuzzStone, who only excluded TMAN and suchmoon because they excluded him (for legitimate reasons)). As per the OP, retaliation is not welcome. Therefore, I'm unsure what's theymoses game theory reason for allowing this.

[1] You got nothing to lose (probably), and you get obsessed by negative emotions. If you don't get in, you won't feel permanently excluded to begin with.

I thought you said there were no gangs? so now there are gangs? just you are not in a gang even though looking and bpip fans and receivers lists and dt list support and posting history makes it look like you are?

Or one gang says no other gangs allowed?

Perhaps game theory says gangs must be combated with other gangs? makes sense to me

I mean tman, suchmoon, lauda, gang... complaining about other gangs and their exclusion?

Are gang inclusions allowed ? just not exclusions? I don't get how it works?

What about the legitimate reasons he may have been excluding for?

1. supporting liars.
2. being liars
3. implicated in extortion rackets
4. trust system abuse
5. something about escrowing that people were complaining about

I mean just adding possible insights into things I could not say for sure. However I would certainly exclude you those kinds of people from a trust based system