Quote from: Maverickthenoob on February 04, 2014, 04:38:47 AM

Quote from: madoka on February 04, 2014, 04:10:40 AM

limiting improvements to what we can all understand as to code is stupid. All contribute what we can, a undermine, others promote currency and other program the code.

Excuse my English is not my native language.

Translation:

Limiting our code development to the weakest link (aka those who do not understand code) is akin to dumbing ourselves down. We all contribute, let's not limit our potential by making it understandable (at least in code format) for anyone. The layperson can still understand code if it is explained properly.

Code is nothing more than the expression of an idea, a talented coder can turn any idea into a function. So whether it is understandable in code is irrelevant, we must take the best idea and transform it into code, assuming that is possible. If it isn't we should be able to explain why.

The problem is the limited amount of time that coins have to make changes due to the consensus based design and the trainwreck structuring of the code. This slowly distances the vision that coders have from the vision that the users have. Soon as the vision dies, the coin becomes exchange dust. That's where it lives instead of being used and improved. Finally, there ends up so little evolution, that parasites in Congress think they understand it enough to hijack it. Not on my watch.