Quote from: normana on January 17, 2019, 01:28:25 AM

Quote from: nimiqshitcoin on January 17, 2019, 12:00:33 AM

They never answered some of my questions written long time ago. Here is a list of the facts we were able to dig out. I don't get it why they are trying to hide Huh

They are some hippies being happy eating sushi and smoking weed in Central America. Awesome stuff smoking pot every day and losing ICO investors money Wink

I answered your "facts" from that post already here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1952324.msg49235441#msg49235441 I literally quoted your post and you quoted from my reply so you must have seen that I replied to you. So when you say you never got answers, you are straight out lying here again.

I want an explanation from the Team Nimiq, unless you are team nimiq hiding behind an acronym. Robin Linus suspected you to be a member of team nimiq namely to be Marvin Wissfeld.

Quote from: normana on January 17, 2019, 01:28:25 AM

Quote from: nimiqshitcoin on January 16, 2019, 07:51:47 PM

The document doesn't look very legit to me, especially because it is signed digitally with somebody's signature and it has a yahoo email address. To many of us it looks totally fake.

Interesting how you comment on a document that was just shared with the text "To many of us it looks totally fake.". "us"?

How do you know what many of "us" (whoever that is) think? Or is it maybe that "us" is just the accounts of nimiqshitcoin, john.btc, coinfanatic, sasha.new, andrewjaxx and Scamiq? Because you seem to be very coordinated, often replying each other within minutes to support each other, always online at pretty much the same time, all of you only used their account to FUD against Nimiq, all of you claim to be highly invested into NIM but never provided any proof even if you could get money for it through my refund.

Talking about SEC without a lot of background knowledge, you are not even an US citizen so SEC wouldn't even apply, SEC actually doesn't apply to Nimiq at all, because their token sale was not reachable from US (not possible to participate due to IP bans) and also asked users to confirm they don't have any US citizenship or greencard before being able to contribute in token sale.

When I contributed to the ICO, my IP was not banned. Also, many Americans got into the ICO pre-sale because of this. It is literally impossible to ban all IPs from the United States, and I can confirm the fact that my IP was not banned during the token sale. Moreover, people could have contributed to the token sale being in the States as there was no KYC procedure at the time of the token sale. I am not a native american, but I do have American citizenship.

Quote from: normana on January 17, 2019, 01:28:25 AM

And now you added a reference to Germany, even though everybody knows the project is half-costa-rican, half-german. If I would do a wild guess, these 6 accounts actually belong to just 2 or 3 people from the WebDollar community (bad english, apparently knowledge of romanian language). Maybe consider the possibility your Romanian tech is not superior to other technology and in fact it was proven by some of the Nimiq devs that your WebDollar devs actually stole code from Nimiq. Also did you notice how WebDollar is not on any exchange yet? Maybe Nimiq is actually superior to WebDollar, because right now NIM market cap is something like 2M USD, but WebDollar market cap is just 0. But I can give you one thing: your WebDollars definitely never lost any value.

Dude, probably you smoked to much pot. All the founders are Germans (Robin Linus, Philipp von Styp-Rekowsky, Pascal Berrang, Marvin Wissfeld (you) Elion Chin), the rest of the team are just regular employees. So the team is not half-costa-rican, they are just a bunch of people hired for day-to-day operations including Richy and Jeff - the great coder. I don't give a fuck about WebDollar because I have never invested in their project or in their ICO. I am just mad that I have invested heavily into this project and the project was hijacked by you, Philipp and Pascal and turned into a scam for buyers. You are just smoking pot in Costa Rica and doing shitty activities while calling yourself the great blockchain project in the Galaxy. This is your shitshow, while your project is a total failure and a lot of ICO investors lost heavily. Except for Robin Linus, nobody else acknowledged that the project is a total failure and lost a tremendous amount of money from ICO investors.

Quote from: normana on January 17, 2019, 01:28:25 AM

Quote from: coinfanatic on January 17, 2019, 01:21:42 AM

Nothing but piles of lies! "Workflow of Nimiq Team members during the implementation of the new Nimiq Full Node in Rust" ... Here is proof there was only 1 commit in the last 4 weeks https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs/graphs/contributors
How stupid do you think we are?

I really think you are rather stupid. Please learn how to read GitHub before making any accusations.
- Nimiq has more than just one repository, you are only looking at one of them
- Contribution graphs only display commits to master, not feature branches that are still in development.
- Any commits only pushed to the team internal (non-public) git will not be shown on GitHub at all.
- If developers decide to manager their work locally, and/or squash commits, the number of commits will be very low but the resulting code is still worth the same as if it was 10 commits per day.

I have spotted 2 lies.

Lie no 1. They did not push any code in private repositories for Rust. By default, GitHub is showing as activities including the private commits in private repositories regarding Rust.
Lie no 2. I also checked the branches on the rust implementation. There are 3 branches with 5 commits in total. There is only one commit made by Pascal to the Rust implementation on a separate branch in the last 4 weeks.

https://i.imgur.com/zOcz8Np.png

So, coinfantastic please, you should rephrase your statement to be politically correct: "Here is proof there were only 2 commits in the last 4 weeks "