Quote from: rpietila, the Vassal of the Mighty Goat on February 04, 2014, 10:10:57 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 04, 2014, 09:56:16 AM

Quote from: rpietila, the Vassal of the Mighty Goat on February 04, 2014, 09:46:05 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 04, 2014, 09:27:25 AM

Strawmancount exceeded => delete.

Sry i dont get it. wasnt i raising a fair argument?

Huh

No.

You strawmaned that
- we are building another foundation, even after my HELL; NO, which was to indicate that the opposite is happening.
- claiming that 80% of bitcoins are in hands of early adopters which is not true unless you define "early adopter" by the size of holding and make a cutoff, which would make FBI an early adopter, leading to contradiction.
- Jackson had a wealth distribution agenda (which he didn't but you seem to have).

ok,

1/ so what would be your new foundation's purpose exactly?

2/ i claim that similarly to $$, only a few thousands of people (early adopters or not) have more than 80% of bitcoins which make it not well distributed, hence sensitive to manipulation?

3/Jackson believed that ONLY the government should be allowed to deal with money supply, not banks or any other entity: so what about bitcoins?

i am not trolling, just trying to understand whats in stake at my little level.