Quote from: Micio on January 17, 2019, 08:16:14 PM

Thank you for your suggestion, I appreciate the commitment but I don't want to remove any feedbacks (even if the accounts are old and inactive). These are proofs that trade went well and some users could get irritated. I think I'm using the feedback system as it should be used: send feedbacks after trades and send feedback to users I really trust. There's no reason to remove feedbacks. Anyway, if any of the users in my list or in my sent feedback list do something wrong I'll be ready to remove them or leave a negative feedback. I feel responsible for my DT list and feedback list.

I want to continue with my line of thought so it's better to be removed from DT for the moment, I don't want to bother you and any other DT member so I'm asking coinlocket$ to remove me from the list.

Trust ratings should have references. This helps other users to verify the validity of your ratings and your judgement overall. It's not a problem if a few are missing. It doesn't look good when there is not a single one. Perhaps you can revise the ratings or if you want to get off DT for now - you can always come back later when your sent trust ratings look more solid.

Keep in mind that nobody can really order you what to do so I'm just advising you how you could avoid an exclusion (which might be difficult to remove in the future) and instead earn a more credible inclusion. I feel like I need to add this disclaimer due to all this drama lately.

Quote from: KingZee on January 17, 2019, 07:52:57 PM

But stop witch hunting people just because you disagree with their list choices. Theres a much better solution : Use your own damn vote to exclude them. If YOU dont agree with what they did, it doesnt mean you have to incite other users to do so too. Thats the goal of trust lists. If you start judging every lost on a micro-scale, its 100% bound to be subjective to each members opinion. But if all members agree to include one member (of course without collaborating or working on some mafia trust ring), you can then trust that that member is objectively trusted by the network.

I think you're overreacting. Despite some contentious issues, there has been a lot of reasonable discussion as to what constitutes a good trust list. Exclusions have their uses but there is also value in getting to know the newer members and helping them understand the unfortunately clunky trust system instead of just excluding them.