P1) Lauda is a proven scammer
P2) I am Lauda's pet
P3) A pet of a proven scammer is also a scammer.
C) I am a scammer.
None of your premises can be considered sound without definitive evidence however I will make it easy for you.
Suppose that P1 is true. Prove that P2 and P3 are true, thus creating sound conclusion that follows from sound premises.
who are you to ask proof ? you just fucking slave
and you think i must spend my expensive time for you?
proving who are you?
you must be enough accusation and shut up not write here