Quote from: jasonpitts on February 04, 2014, 05:43:02 PM

Quote from: btmtb on February 04, 2014, 08:16:38 AM

Quote from: BlackArrow Matt on February 04, 2014, 06:43:14 AM

If we can organize a list of questions, I can try getting answers.

I'm personally not interested in the name game, that's just distraction trolling that I'd expect from someone who's been spending too much time on 4chan but lacks their style and panache. If you want to resolve the vapourware concerns you could ask BAS to get Global Foundries to issue a brief press release to confirm the works they're underway with for BAS (I'm assuming GF can't do this without BAS permission, commercial sensitivity etc, but if they come to an agreement I can't see it being a problem).

The second point would be replacing the lost GHS, I'd refer to my earlier post. Something like 100% of the hash rate for the same duration as the delay, or 50% hash rate for 2x the delay.. or so on. This would be my ideal solution.

Please have a think & chat and get back to us. Cheers

(From another Matt!)

I just wanted to say that this all seems like a very sensible solution. There is very little that can make up for the difficulty increase over time, but 100% of the hashrate for the same duration of the delay will show that BAS is willing to suffer with their customers and provides some assurance that BAS will do whatever they can to limit further delays.

100% for the duration of the delay starting when. Starting at (or close to) the promised delivery date is a good offer. Starting "whenever" is a worthless offer.