Quote from: suchmoon on January 21, 2019, 07:41:54 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 21, 2019, 06:55:41 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 21, 2019, 05:46:04 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 21, 2019, 05:07:48 AM

regards to theymos' comment that controversial ratings should carry an actual risk/cost by way of a retaliatory rating, and there does not appear to be any risk/cost to suchmoon in this case.

There is nothing particularly controversial about this rating

Except the fact that you admit you don't have evidence beyond speculation to support your claim against the OP.

It looks to me that your rating was more intended to protect a position of power, and was less so about warning others about a potential scammer.

That's completely false. Repeating ad nauseum how I'm so fervid towards "a position of power" sounds like a projection on your part.

There is evidence, you don't accept it, I get that. I would be shocked otherwise, given that you're often sympathetic to puppeteers and have engaged in this form of art yourself.

LOL says the supporter of pharmacist a proven sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer. haha