Quote from: angercoin on January 24, 2019, 09:13:07 AM

Quote from: kam1l on January 24, 2019, 09:03:32 AM

Quote from: angercoin on January 24, 2019, 08:45:51 AM

Quote from: Shults on January 24, 2019, 08:37:05 AM

Quote from: angercoin on January 24, 2019, 08:30:43 AM

Quote from: Shults on January 24, 2019, 08:18:57 AM

I've already seen hundreds of similar projects. It seems to me that Gamelife wont succeed.

All the projects you mention are centralized, its unlikely that they will be really interesting for the users.

Maybe, but I still dont understand how Gamelife will use decentralization and smart contracts.

Smart contracts replace the sale intermediaries, decentralization allows to make deals directly, avoiding huge commissions which are a common thing for centralized platforms.

But centralized projects sometimes dont have sale intermediaries, too, so I cant say that this is n incredible advantage.

If theres no intermediary, than it takes long to decide wholl be the first to act: a seller or a buyer, thats why the risk is just hug.

Sure it isnt less risky when a centralized platform representative acts as an representative. Just think about it: they make the users agree with a long list of conditions, and theres denial of responsibility among them. Id better wait for release of Gamelife and then sell all my in-game items.