Quote from: tk808 on January 24, 2019, 06:44:59 PM

Quote from: ampirebus on January 24, 2019, 05:57:12 PM

Quote from: tk808 on January 24, 2019, 05:01:06 PM

Quote from: ampirebus on January 24, 2019, 02:56:13 PM

Quote from: a fool and his money ... on January 24, 2019, 10:55:40 AM

Quote from: ampirebus on January 23, 2019, 03:06:41 PM

Quote from: a fool and his money ... on January 23, 2019, 11:58:12 AM

Quote from: cryptounicorn on January 22, 2019, 09:40:52 PM

Quote from: a fool and his money ... on January 22, 2019, 08:11:06 PM

Quote from: cryptounicorn on January 21, 2019, 09:41:35 PM

Do you even check the news? So much was done in the past. Core team issue? Look how beta improved with its functionality. New client updates every week. AB issue? Just check what new partnership he negotiated recently. A lot of things happened, that is if you really follow the project. You just evaluate the project from one aspect: its volume. I don't think this is quite correct. That doesn't reflect true potential of the project.

I began to think often about whether there is any sense in these new partnerships? After all, partners do not implement Universa blockchain. At least I haven't heard about it yet.

What is important then for the project focused on B2B/B2G if it's not the partnerships. We may not see immediate results now but if AB constantly signs new partnerships then something will come out of this, sooner or later.

I do not expect immediate results. For example, we have been waiting for Malaysia for almost a year. No results at all? Nothing done at all?

Universa has launched a project with the Ministry of Commerce of Malaysia to issue smart money that cannot be spent on alcohol and cigarettes. Watch here: https://www.facebook.com/Universablockchain/videos/278760636078713/

Rather, they wanted to launch this project. But they did not launch it. As far as I understand, apart from this loud statement, nothing was done on this progect over the year.

Why do you make such a statement? Please give any proof of it or don't make speculate.

More politics, more bullshit. Where's the proof from the team? The team doesn't disclose information to us, so unless you can contradict his statement with supporting evidence that this is INDEED being used by the Malays, being implemented as spoken (or whatever was agreed on, again it's all in obscurity for us); then what he said is an excellent concern. Let's not play politics or obscure things by asking a question to a question that was asked. Give us the proof to refute his claims, or gtfo.

I'll say it again, it's clear these partnerships are useless, they agree to whatever was agreed on, and then when it comes time to actually using the platform, providing the results, we see/hear nothing, meaning only PR work was done and nothing more. This is due to the enormous complexity dealing with an unknown blockchain, useless UTN, coming from a random company in Russia.

I wish Universa had a better blockchain viewer, to view the amount of TXs conducted, wallets, holders etc, but again incompetency runs high. And no, showing nodes is not what i mean, neither is viewing your own TXs.

Provide the proof ampirebus, and don't give me "NDA bullshit."

Universa provides all the information it has to the community. NDA is a part of business and business culture. We should respect the partners and their business, we should respect NDA. Sometimes you are just to wait to know all. Please read report what have been done in 2018: https://medium.com/universablockchain/happy-u-year-2018-summary-5955deaaf371

Another absolutely useless response.

Answer the question Ampirebus about any status about Malay or in fact, any partnerships use of Universa. You are not providing any details in regards to the partnerships, which is the only tactic that's being used to further Universas agenda, we are not even aware of what's occurring or if anything is actually happening.

Therefore, what A fool and his money stated "Rather, they wanted to launch this project. But they did not launch it. As far as I understand, apart from this loud statement, nothing was done on this progect over the year." stands as fact.

We've not received 1 update, regarding any partnership anywhere and what's actually occurring. USAGE of a blockchain can never be under NDA, strictly because everything is public around public blockchains. Univera's blockchain is not a private one, it's public. Leading into my last question about the explorer, so we can examine what Unviersa is actually being used for.

Again, we can sit here and shuffle around questions, dodging it with other useless information or we can get into the details and start answering real questions.

Universa provides all the information which can be published in public. You should respect the partner's interests also. Using a new technology is always a big advantage and no one wants to inform competitors about their business and planse. Definitely the community will have all the information in time it is possible.