Quote from: Lauda on January 25, 2019, 07:21:51 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 25, 2019, 07:17:34 AM

Oblivious reasons... such as calling out a long history of abusive behavior? Again, notice the complete reliance on personal attacks, accusation, and inquisition. Zero discussion of the arguments presented. This is all these people know how to do, mob, bully, and intimidate. This is the type of person that seeks positions of power. These type of people need to be leashed by a simple protocol to keep their hunger for control over anyone who questions them in check.

Nobody that knows your history here should waste their time discussing your bullshit. FYI snowflake, this isn't any of the above but rather friendly advice for The Pharmacist, i.e. none of your butthurt business. Go whine somewhere else, you ain't coming back into DT.

Yes, I am sure it is quite shameful. Last I checked this is a public discussion. Perhaps you should move to private messages if you don't wish it to be a public discussion? Or maybe you just want to quietly signal to him to shut his mouth because he is making you all look bad?

Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 25, 2019, 07:26:32 AM

If anyone without a reputation was dismissed as a scammer (your claim), it would be very hard for them to end up on DT1. They would have been tagged and would have little chance of achieving that. Out of those members I listed, do you think any of them are scammers? I'd like you to answer that question if you wouldn't mind.

Anyone who questions the decrees of the forum police overlords*

Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 25, 2019, 07:26:32 AM

If you don't see all the scamming that's going on here on the forum, you need glasses. And you've been here long enough to know that there's no contracts when someone pulls off a loan scam, PayPal chargebacks, offers 100% ROI within a week, or any of the other typical BCT scams, nor does anyone mention law. Why would we? Nobody is going to the police for any of the typical scammers that DT members tag.

As far as evidence goes, what do you call the information that gets presented in the scam accusation forms that members fill out when they get scammed? How about the alt accounts abusing bounties? The evidence is all there.

The forum polices itself against scams, and DT goes out of its way to help with that. The DT list is certainly not perfect, but it's nowhere near the cabal of power-hungry little Hitlers that you make it out to be.

Oh I see it. That is exactly my point. This whole Barney Fife act isn't even putting a tiny dent in the fraud, yet there are plenty of negative results of this assembly line style of negative rating you are so fond of. In all the disagreement real con artists slip in and out.

A contract is simply an agreement that is an exchange of value. Your rambling about being no contract is a meaningless misinterpretation of the definition of the word. Either an agreement is honored or it is not. Courts and jurisdictional squabbling need not be involved. If there is evidence... there is evidence... I am not sure what you are arguing about there we agree.

Human beings seek and abuse power. We have rules and laws to make sure the damage of this is limited. I think you and your friends have made a better case for requirement for some system of restraint and standard of evidence than I ever could have.