Quote from: marlboroza on January 25, 2019, 07:52:31 PM

Quote from: mdayonliner on January 25, 2019, 03:57:43 PM

#1 Should we leave red tag to delete post in self-moderated topic?
#2 Should we leave red tag to advertise service like gaining twitter followers?
#3 Should we leave negative for quoting entire post/bad post?
#4 Threat to leave negative if user failed to read a campaigns terms etc etc.

Quote

1) Depends on what is in thread and what was deleted.

Can you explain "depends" please? If anyone create a self moderated topic then they can delete any post if they want. That's why it's self moderated. Why will there be a question for tagging.

Quote

2) How one sells twitter followers? I am not familiar with this. Please explain.

I read a discussion about this where members were were agreeing that this kind of service should be tagged. What's wrong here?

Quote

3) No.

But I have seen the practice. I don't want to bring the name.

Quote

4) Who did this

Again I do not want to bring the name.

Quote

and what does "etc, etc" stands for?

Means I can bring some more incidence like this which is not necessary here. Point is we need to change the way we view things. Spread love, work together, help others to correct them, be forgivable, let other feel that you are not a threat but a friend.

Quote

Quote

- A newbie came to the forum
- Asked for a loan (no collateral)
Without correcting him we are leaving red tag. Justified?

Yep.

Why? Can't you just warn him? If needed then talk to him. Explain him why it's bad. If you are willing to tag him then you should be willing to give him chances too so that he understand the right and wrong. Give him enough chance before giving the final warning which is the red tag.

Quote

Quote

- Someone did great/good work for the community for ages
- He made a silly mistake
To the community he is a bad one now. Justified?

Who and what was silly mistake?

Why it has to be for specific person? I have seen the practice of red tag in this kind of stuffs. Again you can work together here to correct the person instead of creating a mess. I am a victim for this? Think about my escrow offer things. By the way, I already said that it does not have to be for specific person. The practice is for in general.

Quote

Quote

- Someone made a mistake in the past, long ago.
- We discovered it now but in the mean time the member contributed to the forum many ways.
We are waiting to leave a negative trust to ruin his reputation. Justified?

Who, when, what was the mistake?

Same answer here like the previous but not me as example. Point is - there are no need for example. We are practicing this and tagging people whenever we find a chance.

Quote

Quote

- Say you have good reputation in the forum
- Someone planned and claimed that another account is yours which has bad reputation.
Since there are no way to prove that the bad account is not yours you become an innocent victim. Justified?

Who? Give us example.

Again, do not need any specific example.

Look at the feedback left yourself. I am not going to justify all the feedback which is impossible but In general my question is that by leaving those red trust -
how many of them turned good?
Did you help any of them to become a good forum member?

You did not even give them a try (judging by the numbers). If you did then you would see that some of them would turned valuable asset for the community. Sure you can not chance everyone but it does not harm to give a try instead of red paint the profiles in first or second go. Give people enough chance to correct them.

PS: I have no personal agenda with you mate. I hope you take it easy.