---
Where is the #gang in yoru opinion?
I wasn't talking about leaving feedback, I was talking about including/excluding people in lists. Here's an example of two users telling another user to change his list because it includes people they don't agree with :
User
duesoldi added by coinlocket$,
He have left 9
positive feedback starting from 2019-01-11, and also by local language. No any reference link or no any negative feedback.
User
Micio added by coinlocket$,
Although his all feedback old. He does not leaving feedback from last 2 month but all the
feedback is positive, no any negative feedback there.
@coinlocket$ can you please revise your custom list (DT2) ?
I've sent him a PM about this. Hopefully he will respond soon.
You could just scroll through page 43 and below to see a lot more example of this, I just remembered the message above because it was the one that caused me to comment the first time about this issue.
What I'm saying is that Lauda and any other user judging each user's list, and forcing their completely biased opinions is just wrong.. Like, if he wants to include someone that didn't leave a lot of feedback, and another that left local feedback, and you think that's wrong, it's YOUR BIASED opinion. Those people aren't scammers or objectively bad people, so telling another user to change his list based on your personal views is just going to centralize the system, and all lists are going to become copies of Lauda's utopia.
This is my one and only point that I'm going to stand for. It's because it affects everyone on the forums, because it changes the default trust list. Anything else I couldn't give half a fuck about, you guys can leave red or positive feedback to each other all you want, because it's just interpersonal drama, and it doesn't affect every user on the forums.