Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 25, 2019, 07:21:41 PM

We had this discussion about consistency vs. treating each case individually when the situation happened with iluvbitcoins. I meant it when I said that the little voice in my head was telling me not to tag him because he wasn't the average scummy account seller.

Correct timestamp: you tagged iluvbitcoins, then you removed tag, then you tagged him again, then he retaliated "trust abuse", then Ognasty included him to his trust network, then your trust become little orange -1 and then you removed tag.

Besides, iluvbitcoins mentioned in thread that he wouldn't sell account to some random newbie, which isn't the case here.

Btw, @grtthegreat, you didn't address this:

Quote from: marlboroza on January 25, 2019, 11:17:31 PM

Quote from: grtthegreat on January 25, 2019, 08:01:05 PM

8. Date: 23rd January 2019
-> He (rmccatch) further PMs me this (pic also includes my reply).

-> But, by that time, "Zoel" (owned by rmccatch) already has the post on shasan's thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161170.msg49384324#msg49384324

You mean zazarb's thread.
And you haven't thought it would be OK to warn zazarb or anyone else that account changed hands? At least with neutral?

Question. No one here mentioned shasan (I double checked it) and not a single account posted in shasan's thread.
What he has to do with this thread?

For example, shasan also takes forum accounts as collateral but he runs scam accusation against them when they default, as far as I can see. You did literally nothing.

Quote from: grtthegreat on January 25, 2019, 08:01:05 PM

3. Regarding the ponzi, the thread is almost 5 years old, it was back in my very early days to bitcoin, and I do agree that it was quite a dick move.

I left neutral on profile for now.